{"id":61,"date":"2021-07-01T17:37:32","date_gmt":"2021-07-01T17:37:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/?page_id=61"},"modified":"2021-07-19T19:36:56","modified_gmt":"2021-07-19T19:36:56","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Publications<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2020 and in press<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2020). The precision-bias distinction for evaluating visual decision aids for risk perception. Medical Decision Making, 40, 846-853.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Warden, A. C. (in press). Better sensitivity to linear and non-linear trends with position than color. Journal of Vision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Laitin, E. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. (in press). The Pong effect as a robust visual illusion: Evidence from manipulating instructions. Perception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Parnes, J. E., Tenhundfeld, N. L. (in press). Wielding a gun increases judgments of others as holding guns: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., &amp; Culham, J. (2020). No evidence for a role for motor simulation in naming tools upon further inspection: A commentary on Witt, Kemmerer, Linkenauger, &amp; Culham (2010). Psychological Science, 31, 1036-1039.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rohrer, J., et al. (in press). Putting the self in self-correction: Findings from the loss-of-confidence project. Perspectives in Psychological Science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2020). Can automation be embodied? Evaluating whether action automation influences visual perception. Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 82, 3234-3249.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2020). Action&#8217;s influence on spatial perception: Resolution and a mystery. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 153-157.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2019). Introducing hat graphs. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 31.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2019). Graph construction: An empirical investigation on setting the range of the y-axis. Meta-Psychology, 3, MP.2018.895.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wickens, C. D., Clegg, B. A., Witt, J. K., Smith, C.A.P., Herdener, N., &amp; Spahr, K. S. (2020). Model of variability estimation (MOVE): Factors influencing human prediction and estimation of variance in continuous information. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21(2), 220-238.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2019). The perceptual experience of variability in line orientation is greatly exaggerated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(8), 1083-1103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Laitin, E. L., Tymoski, M. J., Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2019). The uphill battle for action-specific perception. Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 81, 778-793.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2019). Insights into criteria for statistical significance from signal detection analysis. Meta-Psychology, 3, MP.2018.871.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2018<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2018). In absence of an explicit judgment, action-specific effects still influence an action measure of perceived speed. Consciousness and Cognition [Special issue in memory of Bruce Bridgeman], 64, 95-105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2018). Perception and action. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Stevens&#8217; Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (4th ed., Vol. 2: Sensation, Perception, and Attention, pp. 489-523). New York: Wiley.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Tymoski, M. J. (2018). Is there a chastity belt on perception? Psychological Science, 29(1), 139-146.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>King, Z.R., Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2018). What you see and what you are told: An action-specific effect that is unaffected by explicit feedback. Psychological Research, 82(3), 507-519.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2018). Spatial biases from action. In T. Hubbard (Ed.), Spatial Biases (pp. 307-323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2017<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2017). A role for control in an action-specific effect on perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1791-1804.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2017). Action Potential Influences Spatial Perception: Evidence for Genuine Top-Down Effects on Perception. Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 24(4), 999-1021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2017).&nbsp; Distances on hills look farther than distances on flat ground: Evidence from converging measures.&nbsp; <em>Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 79<\/em>(4), 1165-1181.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2017).&nbsp; Replicability, response bias, and judgments, oh my! A new checklist for evaluating the perceptual nature of action-specific effects.&nbsp; In B. H. Ross (Ed.), <em>Psychology of Learning and Motivation <\/em>(Vol 66, pp. 117-165). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; Bielak, A. A. M. (2017). Dissociating perception from judgment in the action-specific effect of blocking ease on perceived speed. <em>Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 79 <\/em>(1), 283-297.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., Witt, J. K., &amp; Pratt, J. (2017).&nbsp; A different kind of weapon focus: Simulated training with ballistic weapons reduces change blindness.&nbsp; <em>Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2:3<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2016<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Sugovic, M., Tenhundfeld, N. L., &amp; King, Z. (2016). An Action-Specific Effect on Perception that Avoids All Pitfalls.&nbsp; <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39<\/em>, e229.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Taylor, J. E. T., Sugovic, M., &amp; Wixted, J. T. (2016).&nbsp; Further clarifying signal detection theoretic interpretations of the M\u00fcller-Lyer and sound-induced flash illusions.&nbsp; <em>Journal of Vision, 16<\/em>(11), 19 (1-7).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Taylor, J. E. T., Sugovic, M., &amp; Wixted, J. T. (2016).&nbsp; Corrigendum to Signal detection measures cannot distinguish perceptual biases from response biases. <em>Perception, 45<\/em>(8), 964-965.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Sugovic, M., &amp; Dodd, M. D. (2016). Action-specific perception of speed is independent of attention.&nbsp; <em>Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 78<\/em>(3), 880-890.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., &amp; Wickens, C. D. (2016). Action-specific effects in perception and their potential applications: A reply to commentaries. <em>Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5<\/em>(1), 88-93.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., &amp; Wickens, C. D. (2016). Action-specific effects in perception and their potential applications. <em>Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5<\/em>(1), 69-76.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sugovic, M., Turk, P., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2016).&nbsp; Perceived distance and obesity: It\u2019s what you weigh, not what you think.&nbsp; <em>Acta Psychologica, 165<\/em>, 1-8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2015<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2015). Awareness is not a necessary characteristic of a perceptual effect: Commentary on Firestone (2013).<em> Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10<\/em>(6), 865-872<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Philbeck, J. W., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2015). Action-specific influences on perception and post-perceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Bulletin, 141<\/em>(6), 1120-1144. [Both authors contributed equally.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Taylor, J. E. T., Sugovic, M., &amp; Wixted, J. T. (2015).&nbsp; Signal detection measures cannot distinguish perceptual biases from response biases. <em>Perception, 44<\/em>, 289-300.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., Pratt, J., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2015). Joint attention for stimuli on the hands: Attention matters.&nbsp; <em>Frontiers in Psychology, 6<\/em>, 543.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2015).&nbsp; Listening to music primes space: Pianists, but not novices, simulate heard actions.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Research, 79<\/em>, 175-182<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Riley, M. (2014).&nbsp; Discovering your inner Gibson: Reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches. <em>&nbsp;Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 21<\/em>(6), 1353-1370<em>. &nbsp;<\/em>[Both authors contributed equally.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2014). Altered attention for stimuli on the hands.&nbsp; <em>Cognition, 133<\/em>, 211-225.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2014).&nbsp; The Costs of Action: Comment on &#8220;Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge&#8221; by Michiel van Elk, Hein van Schie and Harold Bekkering.&nbsp; <em>Physics of Life Reviews, 11<\/em>, 265-266.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., South, S. C., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2014).&nbsp; A perceiver\u2019s own abilities influence perception, even when observing others. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 21<\/em>, 384-389<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Biggs, A. T., Brockmole, J. R., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2013).&nbsp; Armed and attentive: Holding a weapon can bias attentional priorities in scene viewing. &nbsp;<em>Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics, 75, <\/em>1715-1724.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., &amp; Metcalfe, J. (2013).&nbsp; From revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology.&nbsp; <em>Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8<\/em>(5), 574-586. [All authors contributed equally.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2013).&nbsp; Catching ease influences perceived speed: Evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.&nbsp; <em>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 20<\/em>, 1364-1370.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sugovic, M., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2013).&nbsp; An older view of distance perception: Older adults perceive walkable extents as farther.&nbsp; <em>Experimental Brain Research, 226<\/em>, 383-391.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2013).&nbsp; Spiders appear to move faster than non-threatening objects regardless of one\u2019s ability to block them.&nbsp; <em>Acta Psychologica, 143,<\/em> 284-291<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2013).&nbsp; Response bias cannot explain action-specific effects: Evidence from compliant and non-compliant participants. <em>Perception, 42<\/em>, 138-152.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2013).&nbsp; The world within reach: Effects of hand posture and tool-use on visual cognition.&nbsp; <em>Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22<\/em>, 38-44.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Brockmole, J. R. (2012).&nbsp; Action alters object identification: Wielding a gun increases the bias to see guns.<em> Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38<\/em>, 1159-1167<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., Witt, J. K., &amp; Grimaldi, P. (2012).&nbsp; Uncovering the connection between artist and audience: Viewing painted brushstrokes evokes corresponding action representations in the observer. <em>Cognition, 125<\/em>, 26-36.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Sugovic, M., &amp; Taylor, J. E. T. (2012).&nbsp; Action-specific effects in a social context: Others\u2019 abilities influence perceived speed.&nbsp; <em>Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38<\/em>, 715-725<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2012).&nbsp; Get me out of this slump!&nbsp; Visual illusions improve sports performance. <em>Psychological Science, 23, <\/em>397-399<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2012).&nbsp; Does ease to block a ball affect perceived ball speed? Examination of alternative hypotheses. <em>&nbsp;Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38<\/em>, 1202-1214<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., &amp; Witt, J. K. (2012). Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: Real, imagined, and remembered.&nbsp; <em>Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38<\/em>, 80-89.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2011<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2011).&nbsp; Action\u2019s effect on perception. <em>Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20<\/em>, 201-206.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K. (2011).&nbsp; Tool use influences perceived shape and parallelism: Indirect measures of perceived distance.&nbsp; <em>Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, <\/em>1148-1156.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Linkenauger, S. A., Witt, J. K., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2011).&nbsp; Taking a hands-on approach: Apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size.&nbsp; <em>Journal <\/em><em>of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37<\/em>, 1432-1441<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Schuck, D. M., &amp; Taylor, J. E. T. (2011).&nbsp; Action-specific effects underwater.&nbsp; <em>Perception<\/em>, <em>40<\/em>, 530-537.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taylor, J. E. T., Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2011).&nbsp; When walls are no longer barriers: Perception of wall height in parkour. &nbsp;<em>Perception, 40<\/em>, 757-760.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2010<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Sugovic, M. (2010).&nbsp; Performance and ease influence perceived speed.&nbsp; <em>Perception<\/em>, <em>39<\/em>, 1341-1353.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., &amp; Culham, J. (2010).&nbsp; A functional role for motor simulation in naming tools.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Science, 21<\/em>, 1215-1219.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., &amp; Epstein, W. (2010).&nbsp; When and how are spatial perceptions scaled?&nbsp; <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1153-1160.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Miles, J. D., Witt, J. K., &amp; Proctor, R. W. (2010).&nbsp; Action plans produce separate Simon effects for picking up objects and transporting them.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Research<\/em>, <em>74<\/em>, 468-475.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2009<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Dorsch, T. (2009).&nbsp; Kicking to bigger uprights: Field goal kicking performance influences perceived size.&nbsp; <em>Perception, 38, <\/em>1328-1340.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., Augustyn, J. A., Cook, A. S., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2009).&nbsp; The long road of pain: Chronic pain increases perceived distance.&nbsp; <em>Experimental Brain Research<\/em>, <em>192<\/em>, 145-148.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Linkenauger, S. A., Witt, J. K., Bakdash, J. Z., Stefanucci, J. K., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2009).&nbsp; Asymmetrical body perception: A possible role for neural body representations.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Science<\/em>, <em>20<\/em>, 1373-1380.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Linkenauger, S. A., Witt, J. K., Stefanucci, J. K., Bakdash, J. Z., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2009).&nbsp; The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance.&nbsp; <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, <\/em>1649-1660.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2008).&nbsp; Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size.&nbsp; <em>Psychonomic Bulletin and Review<\/em>, <em>15<\/em>, 581-585.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Ashe, J., &amp; Willingham, D. T. (2008).&nbsp; An egocentric frame of reference for implicit motor skill learning.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Research<\/em>, <em>72<\/em>, 542-552.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Proffitt, D. R. (2008).&nbsp; Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation.&nbsp; <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, <em>34<\/em>, 1479-1492.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2007 &amp; Earlier<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Proffitt, D.R. (2007).&nbsp; Perceived slant: A dissociation between perception and action.&nbsp; <em>Perception<\/em>, <em>36<\/em>, 249-257.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Stefanucci, J.K., Riener, C.R., &amp; Proffitt, D.R. (2007).&nbsp; Seeing beyond the target: Environmental context affects distance perception.&nbsp; <em>Perception<\/em>, <em>36<\/em>, 1752-1768.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Willingham, D.T. (2006).&nbsp; Evidence for separate representations for action and location in implicit motor sequencing.&nbsp; <em>Psychonomic Bulletin and Review<\/em>, 13, 902-907.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D.R., &amp; Epstein, W. (2005).&nbsp; Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it. <em>&nbsp;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, <em>31<\/em>, 880-888.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., &amp; Proffitt, D.R. (2005).&nbsp; See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average.&nbsp; <em>Psychological Science<\/em>, <em>16<\/em>, 937-938.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D.R., &amp; Epstein, W. (2004).&nbsp; Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. <em>Perception<\/em>, <em>33<\/em>, 570-590.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Publications 2020 and in press Witt, J. K. (2020). The precision-bias distinction for evaluating visual decision aids for risk perception. Medical Decision Making, 40, 846-853. Witt, J. K., &amp; Warden, A. C. (in press). Better sensitivity to linear and non-linear trends with position than color. Journal of Vision. Laitin, E. L., &amp; Witt, J. K. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template-no-page-title.php","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-61","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post-preview"],"taxonomy_info":[],"featured_image_src_large":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"bgchilds","author_link":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/author\/bgchilds\/"},"comment_info":0,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/61","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/61\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63,"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/61\/revisions\/63"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychlabs.colostate.edu\/witt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}